Who would have thought when we entered the wild card round that the lowly New York Giants would make it to the Super Bowl? They were underdogs in every game they played, and they'll continue to be an underdog in the Super Bowl. It looks like Eli Manning finally figured out how to play with consistency at just the right time. Along with the Packers, we've seen the Mighty Cowboys and Colts go down in upsets as well. The Giants will get one more chance at their greatest upset in about one and a half weeks.
As for the games this weekend, I only managed to field one pick (San Diego +14) and never really spent much time analyzing the Giants game as I was too busy enjoying all of the glorious food, alcohol, landmarks, and doughnuts that New York has to offer. Consequently, I finish this weekend 1-0, and will only have 10 picks total when the playoffs are done. It's not a bad thing to not pick a game, though. If you aren't confident or comfortable, you should stay away when it comes to betting, especially in the regular season. You will have plenty more opportunities to wager money in the future, and you'll be kicking yourself if you lose your shirt on a game you didn't really like.
On a side note, I asked a New Yorker why there was not any rioting in the streets after the Giants upset Green Bay. His response was, "It's too cold."
Seeing as it was about 15 degrees or so at the time, I couldn't blame him.
New England: 21 San Diego: 12
If the Chargers could have figured out how to score a touchdown, my dream of an underdog superbowl would have come true. The defense did a great job of containing Brady, though Maroney got loose in the second half as a consequence. Still, I don't see how they realistically could have expected a better job from their defense.
The offensive side of the ball is where the Chargers lost the game. They picked off Brady 3 times and had great opportunities inside the 10-yard line and simply couldn't score. The redzone is definitely where the loss of LT impacted the Chargers the most. He set the NFL record for TDs in a season, and while Turner-Sproles are serviceable backups, they don't have the same presence that LT does in the redzone. Ultimately the defense kept it close enough to be interesting, but the wounded offense did not have enough left in the tank. A pretty good game to watch overall, and the Patriots have looked more and more vulnerable every week in my opinion, especially on defense.
NY Giants: 23 Green Bay: 20 (overtime)
Lawrence Tynes is the happiest man in New York. I was watching the game in the city and a friend of a friend that was with me is a pretty passionate fan, and he was getting ready to round up a mob and hunt the kicker down. Luckily, Tynes got his act together and surprisingly made a 47-yarder to win the game.
Overall, I thought the Giants looked like the better team throughout the game. They moved the ball effectively and their defense did a pretty good job pressuring Favre and making stops. If it weren't for the 90-yard catch and run by Driver (I think him tossing the Giants CB to the ground surprised everyone), the game wouldn't have been close. The Packers just didn't look good. Grant was a non-factor, which I thought would happen a week ago against Seattle. The Giants seem to get better and better each week, and surprisingly, Aaron Ross was available which helps the secondary quite a bit. Green Bay will be a good team again next year if Favre comes back, and will benefit from the playoff experience this year.
The playoff this year have been great for the underdogs ATS. 2-2 in the wildcard round, 3-1 in the divisional round, and 2-0 in the championship round. The early line on the Superbowl is the Pats -12, and with the way the game went in week 17, and how the Giants have progressed since, it's hard not to like the Giants +12. If they can manage to win ATS, that would make the 'dogs 8-3 for the playoffs. While the favorites struggling generally favors Vegas and odds-makers, you can make great money on the moneyline in these games. Out of the 8 games in which the 'dogs covered, 4 of them were outright upsets, with spreads of +3, +7, +7.5, and +10. It's hard to predict upsets, but the trend makes it even harder not take the Giants and the points, with maybe even a small wager on the moneyline in the Super Bowl.
I'll probably make a few posts between now and the Super Bowl. I wanted to get my game recap in since I just arrived back in San Diego last night, and I hope everyone had a good Championship weekend. Following the Super Bowl, the purpose of this blog will shift gears to fantasy football, focusing on the draft, trades, free agency, etc. Once the regular season roles around next year, I'll try to maintain weekly updates of picks and fantasy recommendations... I'm thinking maybe a Thursday fantasy post and a Friday betting post. We'll see.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Early Look- One Touchdown or Two?
I was watching some ESPN today and listened to everyone on there say San Diego has zero chance of winning this week. Ironic, considering they all said San Diego had zero chance of winning last week, as well. I don't think too many people saw the Chargers beating the Colts. Nobody sees them beating the Pats either, but this is the time of year where crazy things happened. If somebody out there has a perfect playoff bracket going, congratulations.
Looking at the lines, we have a 2 TD spread in the AFC game and a 1 TD spread in the NFC game. I'm still undecided on the Packers-Giants and need to watch some more highlights of the Giants-Cowboys game. However, 14 points seems like a lot for the Pats to cover. Their offense was next to perfect last week and they beat Jacksonville by 11. San Diego, injured as they may be, still field a decent offense. When these teams played in week 2, San Diego didn't have Chambers and it felt like the team was still trying to get chemistry together. If they're healthy enough to play good football, they should be able to hang around within a touchdown or two. They will need more fluke plays and timely turnovers if they want any chance of pulling a second consecutive upset.
Other than the games, not much more exciting news yet. Coaches are being fired and interviewed, but there hasn't been anything too surprising. The biggest news during the week will be the injuries to the Chargers and the Giants. Both of these teams need to hope for some medical miracles if they want to make it to the superbowl.
Looking at the lines, we have a 2 TD spread in the AFC game and a 1 TD spread in the NFC game. I'm still undecided on the Packers-Giants and need to watch some more highlights of the Giants-Cowboys game. However, 14 points seems like a lot for the Pats to cover. Their offense was next to perfect last week and they beat Jacksonville by 11. San Diego, injured as they may be, still field a decent offense. When these teams played in week 2, San Diego didn't have Chambers and it felt like the team was still trying to get chemistry together. If they're healthy enough to play good football, they should be able to hang around within a touchdown or two. They will need more fluke plays and timely turnovers if they want any chance of pulling a second consecutive upset.
Other than the games, not much more exciting news yet. Coaches are being fired and interviewed, but there hasn't been anything too surprising. The biggest news during the week will be the injuries to the Chargers and the Giants. Both of these teams need to hope for some medical miracles if they want to make it to the superbowl.
Monday, January 14, 2008
Weekend Recap --- Sunday, Bloody Sunday
What a day of football. All was normal in the world on Saturday. The favorites were dominant and advanced easily. Then, Sunday happened. A double digit underdog, without it's key players, upsets the AFC 2 seed. A touchdown underdog with a QB nobody likes manages to go into Dallas and walk out victoriously. As easy as it is to pencil in the favorites for the conference championship games, days like Sunday are why they have to play the game first.
On to the games.
Seattle: 20 Green Bay: 42
Wow. That was some serious snow. What a dominant performance by Green Bay. I questioned Ryan Grant in my first post on the game and boy, did he respond- 207 rushing yards and 3 TDs. I obviously felt pretty good about my Seattle pick in the first quarter, but it was apparent by half-time that Favre and the Packers wouldn't be stopped. Favre escaping the sack and throwing an underhanded toss to his receiver for a first down (on third down, no less) was vintage Brett Favre. Seattle had a chance to keep it close, but the snow was hampering their pass game, epitomized by Pollard letting a TD pass when he was wide open go right through his hands. The weather is always an important factor in December and January football, and I didn't pay enough attention to it in this game.
Jacksonville: 20 New England: 31
Great offensive game. Unfortunately for Jacksonville, their defense didn't show up whatsoever, and no team is going to beat the Patriots is a purely offensive contest. Both teams ran the ball well, and that kept the game moving at a quick pace and left those with Jacksonville and the points little to worry about. The Patriots look unstoppable on offense, and the match-up with San Diego next week will probably provide another entertaining game.
San Diego: 28 Indianapolis: 24
Wow. What an upset. If someone would have told me Peyton would throw for 400+ yards and LT would be injured in the second quarter, and asked me to predict the score, I probably would have said Colts 42, Chargers 10. The Chargers D gave up a ton of yards but made plays when they needed to, and benefited from the Colts dropping balls or deflecting them into interceptions, fumbles, and the subsequent points the Colts let slip away. Still, during the game, I sort of had the feeling the Colts would eventually pull away, but they never did. They committed too many mistakes, and San Diego capitalized. And where in the world did Billy Volek come from? He didn't look good in relief duty earlier this year, but he was amazing on Sunday.
The Chargers earned this win just as much as the Colts gave it away. However, that pass defense needs to play quite a bit better next week if they even want to try to keep up with the Patriots.
NY Giants: 21 Dallas: 17
Apparently the Giants pass rush really is new and improved. They certainly got to Romo well enough (2 sacks, 10+ hits). That, combined with some key Dallas drops, was the difference in the game. Marion Barber ran well, but Romo only completed 50% of his passes. I didn't see this game in its entirety, but from what I saw, NY contained Dallas and Eli Manning managed the game, turn-over free. The offense was also the beneficiary of several Dallas penalties, which sustained touchdown drives. Overall, it was just a really disappointing performance by the Dallas offensive line and wide receivers. Romo will shoulder some of the blame, but it didn't really look like there was much else he could do.
Well, my picks didn't do well this weekend. I'd like to thank Wes Welker for dropping a pass which held the Pats to a field goal and kept me from going 0-4. These upsets will create lopsided lines next week. The Pats are at -14 right now and The Pack is at -7. I'm headed off to New York this Thursday, so I'll probably try to post on the games on Wednesday. Hope you enjoyed your weekend of football; even when the picks don't work out, at least it's still fun to watch this time of year.
On to the games.
Seattle: 20 Green Bay: 42
Wow. That was some serious snow. What a dominant performance by Green Bay. I questioned Ryan Grant in my first post on the game and boy, did he respond- 207 rushing yards and 3 TDs. I obviously felt pretty good about my Seattle pick in the first quarter, but it was apparent by half-time that Favre and the Packers wouldn't be stopped. Favre escaping the sack and throwing an underhanded toss to his receiver for a first down (on third down, no less) was vintage Brett Favre. Seattle had a chance to keep it close, but the snow was hampering their pass game, epitomized by Pollard letting a TD pass when he was wide open go right through his hands. The weather is always an important factor in December and January football, and I didn't pay enough attention to it in this game.
Jacksonville: 20 New England: 31
Great offensive game. Unfortunately for Jacksonville, their defense didn't show up whatsoever, and no team is going to beat the Patriots is a purely offensive contest. Both teams ran the ball well, and that kept the game moving at a quick pace and left those with Jacksonville and the points little to worry about. The Patriots look unstoppable on offense, and the match-up with San Diego next week will probably provide another entertaining game.
San Diego: 28 Indianapolis: 24
Wow. What an upset. If someone would have told me Peyton would throw for 400+ yards and LT would be injured in the second quarter, and asked me to predict the score, I probably would have said Colts 42, Chargers 10. The Chargers D gave up a ton of yards but made plays when they needed to, and benefited from the Colts dropping balls or deflecting them into interceptions, fumbles, and the subsequent points the Colts let slip away. Still, during the game, I sort of had the feeling the Colts would eventually pull away, but they never did. They committed too many mistakes, and San Diego capitalized. And where in the world did Billy Volek come from? He didn't look good in relief duty earlier this year, but he was amazing on Sunday.
The Chargers earned this win just as much as the Colts gave it away. However, that pass defense needs to play quite a bit better next week if they even want to try to keep up with the Patriots.
NY Giants: 21 Dallas: 17
Apparently the Giants pass rush really is new and improved. They certainly got to Romo well enough (2 sacks, 10+ hits). That, combined with some key Dallas drops, was the difference in the game. Marion Barber ran well, but Romo only completed 50% of his passes. I didn't see this game in its entirety, but from what I saw, NY contained Dallas and Eli Manning managed the game, turn-over free. The offense was also the beneficiary of several Dallas penalties, which sustained touchdown drives. Overall, it was just a really disappointing performance by the Dallas offensive line and wide receivers. Romo will shoulder some of the blame, but it didn't really look like there was much else he could do.
Well, my picks didn't do well this weekend. I'd like to thank Wes Welker for dropping a pass which held the Pats to a field goal and kept me from going 0-4. These upsets will create lopsided lines next week. The Pats are at -14 right now and The Pack is at -7. I'm headed off to New York this Thursday, so I'll probably try to post on the games on Wednesday. Hope you enjoyed your weekend of football; even when the picks don't work out, at least it's still fun to watch this time of year.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Divisional Weekend, Part II
NY Giants @ Dallas Cowboys (-7)
The big news stories on this game so far have been:
1) Eli Manning played very well against New England and Tampa
2) Tony Romo went to Cabo for a weekend
3) The Giants have won 8 straight on the road
My response to all of those headlines is "So what?" Playing well against New England is fine. So did Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Indy. That's where the whole "any given Sunday" thing comes in.
Romo spent his weekend off in Cabo. So? He had the weekend OFF. Just because you or I can't go to Cabo for 2 days doesn't mean he can't. Would Peyton Manning have gone to Cabo? No. He would have watched games and studied film, I'm sure. Romo isn't Peyton though, and since everyone likes to compare him to Brett Favre, why don't they take a look at what he did early in his career? He used to party hard after every game, go out to bars, etc. If Romo would have spent his weekend at home sleeping, no one would care. It's just the media fishing for headlines.
And about those Giants on the road... the best two teams they beat were Washington (week 3, 9-7 reg season) and Philly (week 14, 8-8 reg season). Yawn.
This game is a perfect example of the "What have you done for me lately" mindset that the media has. Having virtually nothing to play for, Dallas has been sleep-walking the past few weeks. NY played two good games in week 17 and the Wildcard round. Dallas will wake up this week, with a healthy TO and rested team. They've already beat NYG twice this year, both times by 10+ points. NY plays this game with out Shockey, and Plax is far into a season that he's been playing with a torn ankle ligament. This should probably be another high scoring meeting, just like the first two, with Dallas coming on top by a 10-14 point margin.
The pick: Dallas -7
Jaguars @ Patriots (-13)
This is the toughest game of the week to predict, in my opinion. Part of me wonders if New England will be even better for the playoffs, that maybe they have another level they can take it to. The second half collapse of Jacksonville's defense last week doesn't arouse a lot of confidence in them either. However, their passing defense is ranked 15th, ahead of both the Eagles and the Ravens, who managed to hang tough against the Patriots. In all of the close New England games, we've seen physical teams running a very conservative, mistake-limiting offense. All of these teams have had a dynamic running back (Addai, Westbrook, McGahee, Jacobs). Jacksonville has a great game-managing QB and a pair of dynamic RBs. The game is really up to the Jaguar's defense. If they can keep the Pats from opening up a 14+ point lead early, they'll be able to run the ball for most of the game, which will be critical to them having any shot in this one. The Pats will almost certainly win, but I don't think they'll cover. I don't really have much analysis to fall back on this one... more of a hunch.
The Pick: Jags +13
The big news stories on this game so far have been:
1) Eli Manning played very well against New England and Tampa
2) Tony Romo went to Cabo for a weekend
3) The Giants have won 8 straight on the road
My response to all of those headlines is "So what?" Playing well against New England is fine. So did Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Indy. That's where the whole "any given Sunday" thing comes in.
Romo spent his weekend off in Cabo. So? He had the weekend OFF. Just because you or I can't go to Cabo for 2 days doesn't mean he can't. Would Peyton Manning have gone to Cabo? No. He would have watched games and studied film, I'm sure. Romo isn't Peyton though, and since everyone likes to compare him to Brett Favre, why don't they take a look at what he did early in his career? He used to party hard after every game, go out to bars, etc. If Romo would have spent his weekend at home sleeping, no one would care. It's just the media fishing for headlines.
And about those Giants on the road... the best two teams they beat were Washington (week 3, 9-7 reg season) and Philly (week 14, 8-8 reg season). Yawn.
This game is a perfect example of the "What have you done for me lately" mindset that the media has. Having virtually nothing to play for, Dallas has been sleep-walking the past few weeks. NY played two good games in week 17 and the Wildcard round. Dallas will wake up this week, with a healthy TO and rested team. They've already beat NYG twice this year, both times by 10+ points. NY plays this game with out Shockey, and Plax is far into a season that he's been playing with a torn ankle ligament. This should probably be another high scoring meeting, just like the first two, with Dallas coming on top by a 10-14 point margin.
The pick: Dallas -7
Jaguars @ Patriots (-13)
This is the toughest game of the week to predict, in my opinion. Part of me wonders if New England will be even better for the playoffs, that maybe they have another level they can take it to. The second half collapse of Jacksonville's defense last week doesn't arouse a lot of confidence in them either. However, their passing defense is ranked 15th, ahead of both the Eagles and the Ravens, who managed to hang tough against the Patriots. In all of the close New England games, we've seen physical teams running a very conservative, mistake-limiting offense. All of these teams have had a dynamic running back (Addai, Westbrook, McGahee, Jacobs). Jacksonville has a great game-managing QB and a pair of dynamic RBs. The game is really up to the Jaguar's defense. If they can keep the Pats from opening up a 14+ point lead early, they'll be able to run the ball for most of the game, which will be critical to them having any shot in this one. The Pats will almost certainly win, but I don't think they'll cover. I don't really have much analysis to fall back on this one... more of a hunch.
The Pick: Jags +13
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Divisional Weekend
Depending on your point of view, this may be the most exciting weekend of playoff football. The upsets are usually the most upsetting here, and we get to see the best teams of the regular season on the field again. It's only Thursday night, but here are my thoughts on a couple of the early lines.
Seattle @ Green Bay (-8)
Maybe I'm just not a believer in Favre, but part of me still isn't convinced by the Packers. Looking back at their schedule, I find nothing inspiring; since the 34-0 stomping they put on Minnesota, they haven't really beat any good teams. That beat down of Minnesota occurred in week 10. Since then, they've beaten Detroit (x2), Oakland, Carolina, St. Louis, and lost to Dallas and Chicago. Moreover, in that clunker of a game they played in Chicago, they lost any chance they had at home field advantage.
Other than Minnesota, none of the aforementioned teams have any sort of respectable run defense. How good is Ryan Grant? He's definitely a home-run hitting back, but his numbers have been boosted by those long runs. In three games, he ran for 15 or fewer attempts and had a average of over 6.7 yards per rush. The Seattle defense is ranked 12th against the rush and they held the Redskins 75 yards and 2.6 yards per rush. If Grant can't get running room, the game will be on Favre's arm, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but if Favre struggles like he did in Dallas and Chicago, Green Bay will have serious problems.
Favre, playoffs, Lambeau field, all in the same sentence, actually sound like quite a good thing. Personally, I think the Seahawks, are a sneaky pick this week. There's the whole Holmgren-Favre relationship, a Seattle offense that is dedicated to passing the ball (don't we know an AFC team that does that?), and the utter lack of playoff experience for most of the key players on the Packers.
The Seahawks +8 sounds pretty good to me. The only time The Pack has covered 8 points against a team with a winning record is week 2 against the Giants and week 10 against the Vikings. I don't know how confident I feel in calling a Seattle upset, but I feel pretty good about this game being within 6 points when it's all said and done. Probably worth waiting until Friday night or Saturday morning though... the money has been moving in the Packer's direction over the course of the week.
The pick: Seattle +8
San Diego @ Indy -9
Got a little long-winded in my GB-Seattle discussion. I think that it's the most interesting game of the weekend. San Diego at the Colts, however, will be less interesting.
The big problem here is that Antonio Gates is likely out. I just saw an update on Rotoworld (www.rotoworld.com) that there are rumors he'd be out for the AFC Championship even the Chargers somehow advanced, so it's probably not a Belichik-ish deception being run by the Chargers. Without Gates, I don't think this will even be a contest. The Colts D has been solid all year long, and for whatever reason, teams have had success stopping LT this year. Albert Haynesworth and th Titans held him to 42 yards on 21 carries. While many people will be quick to point out that Big Al is one of the, if not the best, defensive linemen in the league, Tomlinson has had several other miserable games this year-62 yards against GB, 40 against Minn, 62 against the Jags... and only 76 against the Colts earlier this year.
Speaking of that first meeting, what are the odds Peyton throws 6 interceptions again (or ever again in his career, for that matter)? The Chargers won that game on the virtue of Adam Vinatieri, the most clutch kicker of all time, missing a chip shot. So now, the Chargers go on the road into Indy, on turf, without Gates, against a much healthier Colts team that will likely be featuring Marvin Harrison? And the spread is only 9 points? I'll take the Colts please. Norv might have saved his job by beating the Titans, but the Chargers will be in the exact same spot as last year- out in the divisional round.
The Pick: Colts -9... Buy this one now, it opened at -7.5, and I could see it getting to -10 by Sunday.
Alright, that's it for the evening. I'll try to break down the other two games tomorrow.
Seattle @ Green Bay (-8)
Maybe I'm just not a believer in Favre, but part of me still isn't convinced by the Packers. Looking back at their schedule, I find nothing inspiring; since the 34-0 stomping they put on Minnesota, they haven't really beat any good teams. That beat down of Minnesota occurred in week 10. Since then, they've beaten Detroit (x2), Oakland, Carolina, St. Louis, and lost to Dallas and Chicago. Moreover, in that clunker of a game they played in Chicago, they lost any chance they had at home field advantage.
Other than Minnesota, none of the aforementioned teams have any sort of respectable run defense. How good is Ryan Grant? He's definitely a home-run hitting back, but his numbers have been boosted by those long runs. In three games, he ran for 15 or fewer attempts and had a average of over 6.7 yards per rush. The Seattle defense is ranked 12th against the rush and they held the Redskins 75 yards and 2.6 yards per rush. If Grant can't get running room, the game will be on Favre's arm, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but if Favre struggles like he did in Dallas and Chicago, Green Bay will have serious problems.
Favre, playoffs, Lambeau field, all in the same sentence, actually sound like quite a good thing. Personally, I think the Seahawks, are a sneaky pick this week. There's the whole Holmgren-Favre relationship, a Seattle offense that is dedicated to passing the ball (don't we know an AFC team that does that?), and the utter lack of playoff experience for most of the key players on the Packers.
The Seahawks +8 sounds pretty good to me. The only time The Pack has covered 8 points against a team with a winning record is week 2 against the Giants and week 10 against the Vikings. I don't know how confident I feel in calling a Seattle upset, but I feel pretty good about this game being within 6 points when it's all said and done. Probably worth waiting until Friday night or Saturday morning though... the money has been moving in the Packer's direction over the course of the week.
The pick: Seattle +8
San Diego @ Indy -9
Got a little long-winded in my GB-Seattle discussion. I think that it's the most interesting game of the weekend. San Diego at the Colts, however, will be less interesting.
The big problem here is that Antonio Gates is likely out. I just saw an update on Rotoworld (www.rotoworld.com) that there are rumors he'd be out for the AFC Championship even the Chargers somehow advanced, so it's probably not a Belichik-ish deception being run by the Chargers. Without Gates, I don't think this will even be a contest. The Colts D has been solid all year long, and for whatever reason, teams have had success stopping LT this year. Albert Haynesworth and th Titans held him to 42 yards on 21 carries. While many people will be quick to point out that Big Al is one of the, if not the best, defensive linemen in the league, Tomlinson has had several other miserable games this year-62 yards against GB, 40 against Minn, 62 against the Jags... and only 76 against the Colts earlier this year.
Speaking of that first meeting, what are the odds Peyton throws 6 interceptions again (or ever again in his career, for that matter)? The Chargers won that game on the virtue of Adam Vinatieri, the most clutch kicker of all time, missing a chip shot. So now, the Chargers go on the road into Indy, on turf, without Gates, against a much healthier Colts team that will likely be featuring Marvin Harrison? And the spread is only 9 points? I'll take the Colts please. Norv might have saved his job by beating the Titans, but the Chargers will be in the exact same spot as last year- out in the divisional round.
The Pick: Colts -9... Buy this one now, it opened at -7.5, and I could see it getting to -10 by Sunday.
Alright, that's it for the evening. I'll try to break down the other two games tomorrow.
Launch
Launched on 1/10/08.
The purpose of this blog is for me to blog away about football, primarily, though I imagine snippets of real life will sneak in here during the off-season. I was advised by a prominent member of the fantasy football industry that if I ever want to be considered for any sort of online media, a blog was critical to start with. Can't hurt, plus it be a great forum for me to boast of my fantasy football accomplishments, gambling success, etc. Hopefully some readers will learn a thing or two.
As this post is just to commemorate the launch, I'll keep it brief. The next post will likely be updated with my regular season record ATS and thoughts and picks on the playoff games.
The purpose of this blog is for me to blog away about football, primarily, though I imagine snippets of real life will sneak in here during the off-season. I was advised by a prominent member of the fantasy football industry that if I ever want to be considered for any sort of online media, a blog was critical to start with. Can't hurt, plus it be a great forum for me to boast of my fantasy football accomplishments, gambling success, etc. Hopefully some readers will learn a thing or two.
As this post is just to commemorate the launch, I'll keep it brief. The next post will likely be updated with my regular season record ATS and thoughts and picks on the playoff games.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)